4.7 Review

APOL1 at 10 years: progress and next steps

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages 1296-1302

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.03.013

Keywords

African Americans; APOL1; apolipoprotein L1; chronic kidney disease; glomerulosclerosis; trypanosomiasis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 DK070941, R01 DK084149, R01 MD009055, U01 DK116041]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Intramural Research Program
  3. NIH [RO1 DK108805, DK119380, RC2 DK122397, R01 DK105821, DK087635, DK076077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

APOL1 kidney risk variants have been identified as major drivers of kidney disease in individuals with sub-Saharan African ancestry. Future research aims to focus on characterizing different APOL1 RV phenotypes, further dissecting APOL1-mediated pathways, and developing new therapies.
APOL1 kidney risk variants (RVs) were identified in 2010 as major drivers of glomerular, tubulointerstitial, and renal microvascular disease in individuals with sub-Saharan African ancestry. In December 2020, the APOL1 at Ten conference summarized the first decade of progress and discussed controversies and uncertainties that remain to be addressed. Topics included trypanosome infection and its role in the evolution of APOL1 kidney RVs, clinical phenotypes in APOL1-associated nephropathy, relationships between APOL1 RVs and background haplotypes on cell injury and molecular mechanisms initiating disease, the role of clinical APOL1 genotyping, and development of novel therapies for kidney disease. Future goals were defined, including improved characterization of various APOL1 RV phenotypes in patients and experimental preclinical models; further dissection of APOL1-mediated pathways to cellular injury and dysfunction in kidney (and other) cells; clarification of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions; and evaluation of the role for existing and novel therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available