4.4 Article

Differences in the physicochemical properties of lignins in the heartwood and sapwood of Pinus sylvestris

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOOD CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 177-184

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02773813.2021.1954951

Keywords

Heartwood; sapwood; lignin; phenolic hydroxyl groups; dielectric permittivity

Funding

  1. Instrumentation of the Core Facility Center Critical technologies of the Russian Federation in the field of environmental safety of the Arctic [AAAA-A18-118012390231-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the differences in functional composition, macromolecular, reaction, and electrophysical properties of slightly altered preparations of dioxane lignin extracted from the heartwood and sapwood of pine. It was found that the increased content of carboxyl groups in heartwood lignins leads to a decrease in reaction properties and specific electrical conductivity. Changes in the physicochemical properties of lignins in the wood matrix indicate the continuous transformation of the natural polymer during the life cycle of plants.
Lignin polymers are among the main components of the cell wall and characterized by the highest reactivity due to their polyfunctional nature, the presence of reactive centers and a conjugated polymolecular aromatic structure. Investigation of differences in functional composition, macromolecular, reaction and electrophysical properties of slightly altered preparations of dioxane lignin extracted from the heartwood and sapwood of pine was carried out in this paper. The increased content of carboxyl groups in the heartwood lignins leads to a decrease in the reaction (acid-base and redox) properties and specific electrical conductivity. Changes in the physicochemical properties of lignins in the wood matrix indicate the continuous transformation of the natural polymer during the life cycle of plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available