4.4 Article

Assessing the effect of protic ionic liquid pretreatment of Pinus radiata from different perspectives including solvent-water ratio

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOOD CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 236-248

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02773813.2021.1976797

Keywords

Pine; protic ionic liquid; lignocellulosic biomass; lignin; biorefinery

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [116M444]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the enzymatic transformation of pine pretreated with TEAHSO(4) at different water-PIL ratios, biomass loadings and biomass particle sizes. Adjusting the water content of the PIL solution enhanced delignification performance and increased cellulose content in the biomass. Utilizing a 1:4 water-PIL ratio introduced more favorable conditions for pretreatment, leading to changes in lignin particle size distribution.
In this study, pine (Pinus radiata) pretreated with PIL, triethylammonium hydrogen sulfate (TEAHSO(4)) at different water-PIL ratios (1:9, 1:4 and 3:7), biomass loadings (10-60%) and biomass particle sizes (<1.18 mm, 1.18-1.76 mm and 1.76-2.40 mm) was enzymatically transformed into fermentable sugars. TEAHSO(4) removed 52% lignin with pretreatment at 170 degrees C, 20% loading and 1:4 water-PIL ratio for 3 h, from biomass with the largest particle size. Reducing the water content of PIL solution enhanced delignification performance of PIL under the same conditions; cellulose content of the biomass increased 2-fold by extracting 59% lignin from pine. Compositional changes were supported with saccharification and characterization analyses. Utilizing 1:4 water-PIL ratio introduced more constructive pretreatment conditions with respect to the changes in lignin particle size distribution. Attaining favorable compositional changes for pine as a recalcitrant softwood motivated the contribution of PILs to IL based biorefineries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available