4.7 Article

Analysis of aerodynamic effects and load spectrum characteristics in high-speed railway tunnels

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104729

Keywords

High-speed train; Tunnel wall; Peak pressure; Pressure gradient

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878038, 51678036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the aerodynamic effects and load spectra caused by high-speed trains passing through double-track tunnels using complex mathematical models and simulation techniques. The results show that as train speed increases, the aerodynamic effects also increase, and significant changes in air pressure occur when trains meet or pass through tunnels.
To study the aerodynamic effects and load spectra caused by high-speed trains passing through double-track tunnels, this paper uses unsteady, viscous, compressible Navier-Stokes equations and the Re-Normalization Group k-epsilon turbulence model with sliding grid technology for simulation. A dynamic model test is carried out to verify the calculation method and grid. This study considers the impact of the three main factors of the tunnel aerodynamic effect when the train passes through the tunnel. The peak of the aerodynamic load spectrum when the train is coupled to the tunnel is mainly concentrated in the range of 0-5 Hz. The results show that as the train speed increases, the peak pressure and pressure gradient increase significantly, and the maximum pressure gradient appears in the time between the peak and trough of the head wave. When two trains meet in the middle of the tunnel, the peak pressure and its position change significantly, and the maximum pressure gradient peaks reach 80.58 kPa/s. When two trains exit the tunnel, the pressure presents a fixed period of fluctuations, and the maximum pressure peak is only 0.09 kPa less than the peak when a single train passes through the tunnel at the same monitoring point.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available