4.4 Article

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 2167-2176

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16202

Keywords

canine; gastroenterology; imaging; intestine; ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CEUS can differentiate between dogs with IBD and healthy dogs by evaluating time-intensity curves, but it is not useful for monitoring therapeutic response. Qualitative assessment showed no significant differences between healthy and affected dogs, or between dogs before and after treatment.
Background Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is used to evaluate vascularity of the gastrointestinal wall in neoplastic and inflammatory diseases. Objective To assess the feasibility of CEUS for the evaluation of duodenal perfusion in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Animals Forty-two dogs with IBD and 20 clinically healthy dogs. Methods All CEUS studies of the duodenum were analyzed to obtain time-intensity curves and perfusion parameters. The procedure was repeated in 12 IBD dogs 2 months after a standardized treatment. Results On CEUS, the duodenal wall showed a typical perfusion pattern characterized by a radial and simultaneous enhancement of the wall in all dogs. On qualitative assessment, no differences were observed in contrast medium distribution between healthy and affected dogs, or between dogs with IBD before and after treatment. Peak intensity (PI) and area under the curve (AUC) significantly differed between healthy (PI = 3.58 arbitrary units [au; 1.86-4.93 au] and AUC = 47.63 au seconds [aus, 22.68-62.15]) and affected dogs (PI = 5.10 au [0.63-15.16 au] and AUC = 63.62 aus [5.31-212.20 aus]; P = .03 and .03, respectively). No significant differences were found for the perfusion parameters before and after treatment. Conclusions and Clinical Importance We showed that CEUS allows discrimination between IBD affected dogs and healthy dogs by evaluation of time-intensity curves, but did not provide useful information for monitoring therapeutic response. The qualitative assessment identified no significant differences between healthy and affected dogs, or between dogs before and after treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available