4.2 Article

Influence of panoramic cues during prolonged roll-tilt adaptation on the percept of vertical

Journal

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/VES-210051

Keywords

perception; panoramic; gravity; adaptation; subjective visual vertical

Funding

  1. European Union [604063]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  3. NWO-VICI [453-11-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The perception of vertical relies on vestibular and visual cues. This study found that sustained exposure to panoramic and vestibular cues has a local effect on the subsequent perception of vertical, which is mediated by head orientation.
The percept of vertical, which mainly relies on vestibular and visual cues, is known to be affected after sustained whole-body roll tilt, mostly at roll positions adjacent to the position of adaptation. Here we ask whether the viewing of panoramic visual cues during the adaptation further influences the percept of the visual vertical. Participants were rotated in the frontal plane to a 90 degrees clockwise tilt position, which was maintained for 4-minutes. During this period, the subject was either kept in darkness, or viewed panoramic pictures that were either veridical (aligned with gravity) or oriented along the body longitudinal axis. Errors of the subsequent subjective visual vertical (SVV), measured at various tilt angles, showed that the adaptation effect of panoramic cues is local, i.e. for a narrow range of tilts in the direction of the adaptation angle. This distortion was found irrespective of the orientation of the panoramic cues. We conclude that sustained exposure to panoramic and vestibular cues does not adapt the subsequent percept of vertical to the direction of the panoramic cue. Rather, our results suggest that sustained panoramic cues affect the SVV by an indirect effect on head orientation, with a 90 degrees periodicity, that interacts with a vestibular cue to determine the percept of vertical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available