4.5 Article

Comparative analysis of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes across national registries

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 162-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.105

Keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; Clinical registry; Quality improvement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lower mortality rates were discovered in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAAA) compared to other national registries. Significant differences were found in patient demographics, comorbidity profiles, payer mix, and treatment outcomes across different registries.
Objective: In a recent analysis, we discovered lower mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAAA) in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database when compared with previously published reports of other national registries. Understanding differentials in these registries is essential for their utility because such datasets increasingly inform clinical guidelines and health policy. Methods: The VQI, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and National Inpatient Sample (NIS) databases were queried to identify patients who had undergone elective OAAA between 2013 and 2016. c2 tests were used for frequencies and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Results: In total, data from 8775 patients were analyzed. Significant differences were seen across the baseline characteristics included. Additionally, the availability of patient and procedural data varied across datasets, with VQI including a number of procedure-specific variables and NIS with the most limited clinical data. Length of stay, primary insurer, and discharge destination differed significantly. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality also varied significantly between datasets: NIS, 5.5%; NSQIP, 5.2%; and VQI, 3.3%; P < .001. Similarly, 30-day mortality was found to be 3.5% in VQI and 5.9% in NSQIP (P < .001). Conclusions: There are fundamental important differences in patient demographic/comorbidity profiles, payer mix, and outcomes after OAAA across widely used national registries. This may represent differences in outcomes between institutions that elect to participate in the VQI and NSQIP compared with patient sampling in the NIS. In addition to avoiding direct comparison of information derived from these databases, it is critical these differences are considered when making policy decisions and guidelines based on these real-world data repositories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available