4.4 Article

Mechanical Power Losses of Ball Bearings: Model and Experimental Validation

Journal

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4052064

Keywords

ball bearings; mechanical power loss; powertrain efficiency; lubrication; bearing design and technology; bearings; elastohydrodynamic lubrication; friction; mixed lubrication; rolling; rolling-element bearings; sliding; surface roughness and asperities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A tribo-dynamic model of ball bearings is proposed to predict their load-dependent power losses. The model combines a transient elastohydrodynamic lubrication formulation and a singularity-free dynamics model, establishing a two-way coupling to determine power losses. The model can capture contact kinematics, velocity variations, and asperity interactions on rough contact surfaces.
A tribo-dynamic model of ball bearings is proposed to predict their load-dependent (mechanical) power losses. The model combines (i) a transient, point contact mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) formulation to simulate the mechanics of the load carrying lubricated ball-race interfaces and (ii) a singularity-free dynamics model and establishes the two-way coupling between them that dictates power losses. The dynamic model uses a vectoral formulation with Euler parameters. The EHL model is capable of capturing two-dimensional contact kinematics, velocity variations across the contact as well as asperity interactions of rough contact surfaces. Resultant contact surface shear distributions are processed to predict mechanical power losses of example ball bearings operating under combined radial and axial forces. An experimental setup is introduced for measurement of the power losses of rolling-element bearings. Sets of measurements taken by using the same example ball bearings are compared with those predicted by the model to assess its accuracy in predicting mechanical power loss of a ball bearing within wide ranges of axial and radial forces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available