4.5 Article

Perforation mechanics of UHMWPE soft ballistic sub-laminate and soft ballistic armor pack: A finite element study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 932-960

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/08927057211042058

Keywords

UHMWPE; perforation mechanics; soft-ballistic sub-laminate (SBSL); soft-ballistic armor pack (SBAP); finite element analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a systematic investigation of the perforation dynamics of single layer SBSL and multi-layer SBAPs made from UHMWPE fibers. The minimum perforation velocity is determined for both single layer SBSL and multi-layer SBAPs, with complete perforations identified as progressive perforation of individual layers. It is found that the minimum perforation velocities of multi-layer SBAPs are linearly related to the areal density.
Soft-ballistic sub-laminate (SBSL) made from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers in [0/90] stacking sequence are the building block of a multi-layer soft-ballistic armor pack (SBAP, aka Soft Armor). A systematic study of the perforation dynamics of a single layer SBSL and several multi-layer SBAPs (2, 3, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 layers) is presented for the first time in the literature. A previously validated finite element model of transverse impact on a single layer is used to study the perforation mechanics of multi-layer SBAPs with friction between individual layers. Following the classical definition of ballistic limit velocity, a minimum perforation velocity has been determined for free-standing single layer SBSL and multi-layer SBAPs. For the multi-layer SBAPs, complete perforations have been identified as progressive perforation of individual layers through the thickness. The minimum perforation velocities of multi-layer SBAPS is linear with the areal density for the eight (8) layer target and thicker. Large deformation behavior and perforation mechanics of the SBAPs is discussed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available