4.5 Article

The effect of collector parameters on nanofiber yarns produced by electro yarn spinning machine with conical collector

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages 1785-1798

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1947640

Keywords

Electrospinning; electrospun yarn; nanofiber yarn; conical collector; collector material; collector wall thickness; PAN; PVDF-HFP

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TuBTAK) [117M166]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, electrospun yarns were produced using different polymers and types of collectors, and the effects of various parameters on yarn quality were analyzed. The results showed that yarns produced with aluminium collectors were finer and stronger, and there were differences in fineness and tensile strength between yarns produced with different polymers.
In this work, electrospun yarns were produced by a nanofiber yarn spinning machine with a conical collector. In the first part, two different polymers (PAN and PVDF-HFP) were used in nanofiber yarn spinning with two different types of conical collector which are made of stainless steel and aluminium. In the second part, four different types of aluminium collector having different wall thickness and surface properties were used. For all yarns produced, the effect of different parameters has been analyzed in terms of fibre fineness distribution, yarn fineness and yarn linear density, yarn strength and breaking elongation. The results show that yarns produced by using aluminium collector are finer and have higher strength compare to the ones produced by stainless steel collector while PVDF-HFP nanofiber yarns are finer and have higher tensile strength compare to PAN. The results also show that yarns get coarser while fibres get finer as the collector wall thickness is increased in general.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available