4.7 Article

Asynchronous densification of zirconia ceramics formed by stereolithographic additive manufacturing

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 41, Issue 8, Pages 4666-4670

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.052

Keywords

Stereolithography; Sintering; Densification; Zirconia; Asynchronous

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2018YFB1106900, 2018YFE0109100]
  2. Swedish Research Council [201604191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been found that there is a phenomenon of early surface densification in ceramics manufactured by stereolithography, which may have negative effects on the performance of ceramic components and needs to be controlled through optimization of the sintering protocol.
Stereolithography has been proven as a feasible approach to make crack-free ceramic macrostructure with customized designs, but the microstructure, especially pore structure remains to be tailored more precisely for better performance, where the sintering protocol and related densification characteristics could play a vital role as the slurry preparation and debinding protocol do. Herein we report a phenomenon named ?asynchronous densification?, that is, the surface region of zirconia ceramics formed by stereolithographic additive manufacturing would be densified prior to the bulk at 1200?C during the conventional pressureless sintering in air. The cause of this asynchronism is unclear but supposed to be correlated with low packing density, high sintering activity, poor thermal conduction of ceramics and impurities. Early densification of the surface may have negative effects towards ceramic components with more homogeneous microstructure, suppressed pore coalescence and limited grain growth, and therefore needs to be better controlled through optimization in sintering protocol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available