4.6 Review

Review-Recent Advances on High-Capacity Li Ion-Rich Layered Manganese Oxide Cathodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 168, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac0b58

Keywords

Batteries; Cathodes; Capacity; Lithium ion; Lithium manganese oxide

Funding

  1. South African Department of Science and Innovation (DSI) through its National Nanoscience Postgraduate Teaching and Training Platform (NNPTTP) programme Grant [DST/CON 0025/2011-2021]
  2. South African National Research Foundation (NRF) Research Chair Initiative Chair Grant [85102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses various advances in addressing the drawbacks of LRMO, improving their performance in battery applications. It further explores surface modification techniques and the future development prospects.
Lithium rich manganese oxides (LRMOs) for lithium ion battery cathode applications have generated worldwide interest due to the low cost of manganese owing to its high abundance, their high theoretical capacities as well as the low toxicity of the materials. Amongst the LMRO family, Li2MnO3 (Li[Li0.33Mn0.67]O-2) once thought to be electrochemically inactive, has emerged as a superior candidate for high capacity cathode material application in electric vehicles and grid storage due to exceptional theoretical capacities which are as high as 459 mAh g(-1). However, this material suffers from low initial coulombic efficiencies, capacity fading during cycling and low rate capacities. Herein, we report on various advances that have been made in addressing the above-mentioned drawbacks by suppressing lattice oxygen loss and phase transformations which lead to the poor performance. We will review surface modifications on these materials and their implication in the improvements of LMROs. Finally, we will give an overview of what the future looks like for such materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available