4.6 Article

Similar mortality risk in incident cognitive impairment and dementia: Evidence from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 3568-3575

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17435

Keywords

cause of death; cognitive impairment; dementia; mortality

Funding

  1. Monash University
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [1127060, 1140485, 334047]
  3. National Institute on Aging at the NIH [U01AG029824]
  4. National Cancer Institute at the NIH [U01AG029824]
  5. Victorian Cancer Agency
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1140485] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Older adults with newly detected cognitive impairment or dementia in the ASPREE trial had a higher mortality risk compared to those without cognitive impairment. The mortality rates were similar between those meeting DSM-IV criteria for dementia and those who triggered for a dementia evaluation but did not meet the criteria. This group was more likely to die from sepsis, respiratory disease, and dementia, but less likely to die from cancer compared to the group without triggers.
Background This study examined the risk of mortality in older adults with newly detected cognitive impairment or dementia. Methods Data from the Australian cohort of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial were examined. The ASPREE clinical trial compared daily low-dose aspirin to a placebo and involved 16,703 individuals aged 70 years and over, who were without major cognitive impairment, physical disability, or cardiovascular disease at recruitment. During the trial, evidence of cognitive impairment, based on cognitive testing and medical record information, triggered dementia adjudication of participants using DSM-IV criteria. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare mortality rates across the dementia, trigger-only, and no-trigger groups. Results Over a median 4.7-year follow-up period, 806 participants triggered dementia adjudication, with 485 (60.2%) judged to have dementia. Following recruitment, mortality risks were 32.9, 33.6, and 10.8 events per 1000 person-years in the dementia, trigger-no-dementia, and no-trigger groups, respectively. In the fully adjusted model, mortality risks remained higher in the dementia and trigger-no-dementia groups, with hazard ratios of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3-2.1) and 1.9 (95% CI: 1.5-2.6), respectively. There was no discernible difference between the dementia and trigger-no-dementia groups in mortality rates following recruitment, or following a dementia trigger. These two groups were more likely to die from sepsis, respiratory disease, and dementia, but less likely to die from cancer than the no-trigger group, chi(2) = 161.5, p < 0.001. Conclusion ASPREE participants who triggered for a dementia evaluation experienced a substantially higher mortality rate than those who remained cognitively intact. The increase was indistinguishable among persons who met DSM-IV criteria for dementia vs. those who triggered for a dementia evaluation but failed to meet DSM-IV criteria. Future work should investigate whether earlier detection of cognitive decline can be used to identify and prevent early mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available