4.7 Article

Fiber orientation dependence of tribological behavior of short carbon fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 538-552

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.18075

Keywords

C; C-SiC pads; fiber orientation; short C-fiber; tribological behavior

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201808430296]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52102122]
  3. Science Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education [19B146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on different fiber orientations in short carbon fiber reinforced CMCs showed that pads with fibers oriented at 45 degrees exhibited the best tribological performance, while composites with randomly distributed short carbon fibers remained ideal candidates for manufacturing high performance friction materials.
Carbon fibers as key component in short carbon fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) have obvious influence on their tribological behavior. In this work, we creatively design CMCs with five different fiber orientations, namely, randomly oriented fibers, fibers oriented parallel to the friction surface and angled at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees toward the sliding direction, and standing fibers that are vertical to the friction surface, to investigate fiber orientation dependence of tribological behavior of short carbon fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Tribological tests of CMC brake pads mated with steel disk on a laboratory-scale dynamometer indicate that short carbon fiber reinforced carbon-silicon carbide (C/C-SiC) brake pads with fibers orientated at 45 degrees show the best tribological performance among the pads with fibers unidirectionally aligned. C/C-SiC composites with short carbon fibers randomly distributed, exhibiting excellent tribological properties, are still ideal candidates for manufacturing high performance friction materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available