4.5 Review

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Psychosis Risk in Children and Adolescents With an At-Risk Mental State

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.07.593

Keywords

psychosis risk; psychosis prediction; at-risk mental state; transition

Funding

  1. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  2. Irish Research Council [COALESCE/2019/61]
  3. European Research Council [724809]
  4. Irish Health Research Board [ECSA-2020-05]
  5. St. John of God Research Foundation [2021]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [724809] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The At Risk Mental State (ARMS) approach to psychosis has had a major impact on psychosis services internationally. However, this systematic review and meta-analysis found no evidence that the diagnosis of ARMS was associated with an increased risk of psychosis in children and adolescents up to the age of 18.
Objective: The At Risk Mental State (ARMS) approach to psychosis, also called Clinical/Ultra High Risk, has had a major impact on psychosis services internationally. Despite well-established developmental differences in the prevalence and expression of psychotic symptoms from childhood into adulthood, there has been no systematic review of psychosis transitions specifically in children and adolescents up to age of 18 years. Evidence for this age group is crucial for developmentally appropriate clinical decisions by child and adolescent psychiatrists. Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosis risk among children diagnosed with ARMS up to age 18 years, with pooled transition rates after 1-year, 2-year and >= 5-year follow-up. Results: We retrieved 1,107 records and identified 16 articles from 9 studies reporting transition rates on 436 individuals with ARMS aged 9 to 18 years. The pooled transition rate to psychosis at 1 year was 9.5% (95% CI = 5.5%-14.2%, 7 studies included), at 2-years 12.1% (95% CI = 6.7%-18.6%, 4 studies included), and at >= 5 years 16.1% (95% CI = 5.6%-30.0%, 4 studies included). We did not find evidence that the diagnosis of ARMS was associated with increased risk of psychosis once risk-enriching recruitment strategies were taken into account. Conclusion: At 5-year follow-up, 1 in 6 youths diagnosed with an ARMS had transitioned to psychosis, but we did not find evidence that this risk was related to ARMS diagnosis as opposed to sampling/recruitment strategies. Our findings indicate a need for caution in applying ARMS methodology to children and adolescents. and highlight the need for developmentally sensitive approaches when considering psychosis risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available