4.5 Article

Low-frequency ocean ambient noise on the Chukchi Shelf in the changing Arctica)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages 4061-4072

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0005135

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Independent Research and Development Program at WHOI
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N00014-19-1-2627, N00014-18-1-2811]
  3. ONR [N00014-15-1-2196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the analysis of low-frequency ambient noise recorded on the Chukchi Shelf from October 2016 to July 2017 during the CANAPE experiment, highlighting the traditional polar features of the area as well as the impact of the Beaufort Duct and distant cryogenic events on the variability of the ambient noise.
This article presents the study of a passive acoustic dataset recorded on the Chukchi Shelf from October 2016 to July 2017 during the Canada Basin Acoustic Propagation Experiment (CANAPE). The study focuses on the low-frequency (250-350 Hz) ambient noise (after individual transient signals are removed) and its environmental drivers. A specificity of the experimental area is the Beaufort Duct, a persistent warm layer intrusion of variable extent created by climate change, which favors long-range acoustic propagation. The Chukchi Shelf ambient noise shows traditional polar features: it is quieter and wind force influence is reduced when the sea is ice-covered. However, the study reveals two other striking features. First, if the experimental area is covered with ice, the ambient noise drops by up to 10 dB/Hz when the Beaufort Duct disappears. Further, a large part of the noise variability is driven by distant cryogenic events, hundreds of kilometers away from the acoustic receivers. This was quantified using correlations between the CANAPE acoustic data and distant ice-drift magnitude data (National Snow and Ice Data Center).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available