4.3 Article

Implementation and Effectiveness of a CSPAP-Informed, Online Secondary Methods Course With Virtual Field Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal

JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 508-515

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.2020-0298

Keywords

comprehensive school physical activity program; implementation science; physical education; physical education teacher education; preservice teacher; RE-AIM framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the implementation and effectiveness of an online physical education methods course in the context of COVID-19, finding high fidelity in course delivery with minimal adaptations. The pedagogical approaches of preservice physical education teachers (PPETs) included personalization, inquiry-based instruction, and resilience.
This study examined the implementation and effectiveness of a comprehensive school physical activity program (CSPAP)-informed, 15-week physical education secondary methods course, adapted from its previous in-person format to be completely online for fall 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants were 15 preservice physical education teachers (PPETs) and three course instructors. Each PPET taught six virtual physical education lessons to middle and high school students learning at home. Multiple data sources including focus groups, individual interviews, and course artifacts were analyzed to address research questions centered on the fidelity of course delivery, adaptations made to the course during implementation, and the PPETs' approach to lesson planning and teaching. The findings showed a high level of implementation fidelity, and few adaptations were made to the course. Three themes were identified with respect to the PPETs' pedagogical approach: personalization, inquiry-based instruction, and resilience. This study provides a case example of trying to prepare PPETs for professional roles in the COVID era.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available