4.6 Article

Blocking analysis of suspension-based protocols for parallel real-time tasks under global fixed-priority scheduling

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2021.102107

Keywords

Real-time scheduling; Real-time synchronization; Multiprocessors; Parallel tasks; Mutual-exclusion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61802052, 61632005, 62032004]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [A030202063008085]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612947]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper extends the Priority Inheritance Protocol and the Flexible Multiprocessor Locking Protocol for real-time parallel tasks, presenting blocking analysis and empirical evaluations that show P-PIP outperformed P-FMLP with increasing shared resource contentions.
With the wide use of multiprocessor architecture, parallel tasks have been receiving growing attention in both industry and academia. In real-time systems, the scheduling and synchronization that ensure predictable task execution and resource access are of utmost importance. Although the scheduling of (independent) parallel tasks is widely studied in recent years, few works have been done for the synchronization with intra-task parallelism. In particular, the performance of the classical priority inheritance mechanism is still unfathomed for parallel tasks. In this paper, we extend the Priority Inheritance Protocol (PIP) and the Flexible Multiprocessor Locking Protocol (FMLP) for real-time parallel tasks (i.e., called P-PIP and P-FMLP respectively) under the global fixed-priority scheduling, and present the blocking analysis for both protocols with the stateof-the-art linear optimization technique. Empirical evaluations show that the P-PIP outperformed the P-FMLP with increasing shared resource contentions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available