4.5 Article

False positive FDG uptake in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC)

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 1161-1165

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26607

Keywords

cutaneous melanoma; false positive FDG uptake; FDG-PET; CT; talimogene laherparevec (T-VEC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T-VEC treatment may lead to new FDG uptake in locoregional lymph nodes, which could be falsely classified as suspected metastases. Physicians should be cautious of the high false positive rate of FDG uptake during T-VEC treatment and consider pathological examination of lymph node lesions to differentiate between disease progression and immune infiltration.
Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus-1-based oncolytic immunotherapy and has been approved for the local treatment of unresectable (stage IIIB/C and IVM1a) cutaneous melanoma. During T-VEC treatment, tumor response is often evaluated using [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy- d-glucose(FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). In a Dutch cohort (n = 173), almost one-third of patients developed new-onset FDG uptake in uninjected locoregional lymph nodes during T-VEC. In 36 out of 53 (68%) patients with new nodal FDG uptake, nuclear medicine physicians classified this FDG uptake as suspected metastases without clinical or pathological confirmation in the majority of patients. These false positive results indicate that new-onset FDG uptake in locoregional lymph nodes during T-VEC treatment does not necessarily reflect progressive disease, but may be associated with immune infiltration. In current clinical practice, physicians should be aware of the high false positive rate of FDG uptake during treatment with T-VEC in patients with melanoma. Therefore, pathological examination of lymph node lesions with new FDG uptake is recommended to differentiate between progressive disease and immune infiltration after treatment with T-VEC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available