4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Outcomes in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Implications for Surgical Resident Education

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages E161-E168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.005

Keywords

Fellowship; Residency; Gastric bypass; Minimally invasive surgery; Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that involving surgery residents in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures can help them better prepare for advanced surgeries in a safe manner. The research findings show that regardless of the training level of the assistant, there were no significant differences in complication rates, hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and reoperation rates for patients undergoing LRYGBs.
OBJECTIVES: Some surgery residents feel inadequately prepared to perform advanced operations, partly due to losing operative opportunities to fellows. In turn, they are prompted to pursue fellowships. Allowing residents the opportunity to participate in advanced procedures and complex cases may alleviate this cycle, if their participation is safe. This study examined the effects of resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (LRYGBs). DESIGN: Our MBSAQIP database was used to identify LRYGBs performed at our institution between 2015 and 2018. Operative notes were reviewed to determine training level of the assistant. Patient comorbidities and outcomes (duration of surgery, length of stay, postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations) were stratified by assistant level of training for comparison. SETTING: Urban tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Trainees and attending surgeons acting as assistants during LRYGBs. RESULTS: Among 987 total cases, the assistants for the procedures were chief residents (n = 549, 56%), fourthyear residents (n = 258, 26%), attending surgeons (n = 143, 14%), and third-year residents (n = 37, 4%). Attending surgeons assisted more often when patients had a BMI >= 45 (38% attendings vs. 25% residents, p = 0.007), >= 2 comorbidities (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.007), or had a history of prior bariatric surgery (22% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001).Post-operative complication rate was low (4%) and did not differ significantly between all training levels (p = 0.86). Average length of stay, readmission rates, and reoperation rates were not significantly different across training levels (p = 0.75, p = 0.072, and p = 0.91 respectively). CONCLUSION: Complication rates, hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and reoperation rates were equivalent for patients regardless of the level of training of the assistant for LRYGBs. Involving residents in complex bariatric procedures such as LRYGB is a safe model of education that does not compromise patient safety or hospital outcomes. Involvement in advanced cases allows general surgery residents to more confidently move toward independent practice. ((C) 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available