4.6 Article

Association between offensive and defensive playing style variables and ranking position in a national football league

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 50-58

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1976488

Keywords

Soccer; team sport; elite athlete; professional athlete; sports performance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified key factors for success in the Spanish national league, highlighting that high efficiency in offense and offensive game initiative are most associated with successful football.
The aim of this study was to determine the association of playing style and efficacy variables with football success in a professional football league. Match statistics were obtained from 23 football teams competing in the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 seasons of the Spanish national league(LaLiga). Offensive and defensive playing style and efficacy variables were calculated. Pearson's correlation coefficient tests and principal component analysis (PCA) were applied to establish the influence of these variables on the number of points obtained at the end of the season and on the ranking position. In isolation, the efficacy of completion showed the highest association with ranking points and position. A two-dimension PCA explained 77.8% of the variance in the ranking position. In dimension-1 (58.5%), game initiative and attack building, and in dimension-2 (19.3%), efficacy of defensive containment and a lower rate of long passes were within the variables that explained more variance in the ranking position. Success in football, measured by ranking position at the end of the Spanish national league, was associated with several playing style and efficacy variables. Overall, a dominant game style with high efficacy to finish attacking plays, and an offensive game initiative, are most associated with successful football.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available