Journal
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1787-1793Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.028
Keywords
Shoulder arthroplasty; Fragility Index; randomized controlled trials shoulder surgery; statistical fragility; clinical trials
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study evaluated the statistical robustness of clinical trials regarding shoulder arthroplasty using the Fragility Index and found that most outcomes had a Fragility Index smaller than the number of patients lost to follow-up, with the majority of outcomes being statistically insignificant.
Background: The P value is a statistical tool used to assess the statistical significance of clinical trial outcomes in orthopedic surgery. However, the P value does not evaluate research quality or clinical significance. The Fragility Index (FI) is an alternative statistical method that can be used to assess the quality and significance of clinical research and is defined as the number of patients in a study intervention group necessary to convert an outcome from statistically significant to statistically insignificant or vice versa. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the statistical robustness of clinical trials regarding shoulder arthroplasty using the FI. The secondary goal was to identify trial characteristics associated greater statistical fragility. Methods: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials in shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The FI was calculated for all dichotomous, categorical study outcomes discussed in the identified studies. Descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate all studies and characterize associations between study variables. Results: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were identified and evaluated; these trials had a median sample size of 47 patients (mean, 54 patients; range, 26-102 patients) and a median of 7 patients (mean, 5.8 patients; range, 0-14 patients) lost to follow-up. The median FI was 6 (mean, 5; range, 1-11), a higher FI than what has been observed in other orthopedic subspecialties. However, the majority of outcomes (74.4%) had an FI that was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up, and most outcomes (89.7%) were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Randomized controlled trials in shoulder arthroplasty have comparable statistical robustness to the literature in other orthopedic surgical subspecialties. We believe that the inclusion of the FI in future comparative studies in the shoulder arthroplasty literature will allow surgeons to better assess the statistical robustness of future research. (C) 2020 The Author(s).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available