4.6 Article

FDTD Schemes for Maxwell's Equations with Embedded Perfect Electric Conductors Based on the Correction Function Method

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-021-01591-z

Keywords

Embedded perfect electric conductor; Maxwell's equations; Correction function method; Finite-difference time-domain; High order

Funding

  1. NSERC Discovery Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, staggered FDTD schemes based on the correction function method (CFM) were proposed to discretize Maxwell's equations with embedded perfect electric conductor boundary conditions. The use of fictitious interfaces to fulfill the lack of information on the embedded boundary led to high-order convergence of the CFM-FDTD schemes. Stability and convergence studies were conducted using long time simulations in 2-D for various geometries of the embedded boundary.
In this work, we propose staggered FDTD schemes based on the correction function method (CFM) to discretize Maxwell's equations with embedded perfect electric conductor boundary conditions. The CFM uses a minimization procedure to compute a correction to a given FD scheme in the vicinity of the embedded boundary to retain its order. The minimization problem associated with CFM approaches is analyzed in the context of Maxwell's equations with embedded boundaries. In order to obtain a well-posed minimization problem, we propose fictitious interfaces to fulfill the lack of information, namely the surface current and charge density, on the embedded boundary. We introduce CFM-FDTD schemes based on the well-known Yee scheme and a fourth-order staggered FDTD scheme. We investigate the stability of these CFM-FDTD schemes using long time simulations. Convergence studies are performed in 2-D for various geometries of the embedded boundary. CFM-FDTD schemes have shown high-order convergence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available