4.3 Article

Rural/urban differences in the prevalence of stroke risk factors: A cross-sectional analysis from the REGARDS study

Journal

JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 668-673

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12608

Keywords

cardiovascular; risk factors; rural population; social class; stroke

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
  2. National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
  3. [U01 NS041588]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease were more prevalent in rural areas compared to urban areas, with higher odds in the most rural regions. Adjustment for neighborhood socioeconomic status partially attenuated the odds for hypertension and heart disease in rural areas, completely attenuated the odds for diabetes, and revealed an association with current smoking.
Purpose We previously described the magnitude of rural-urban differences in the prevalence of stroke risk factors and stroke mortality. In this report, we sought to extend the understanding of rural-urban differences in the prevalence of stroke risk factors by using an enhanced definition of rural-urban status and assessing the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) on risk factor differences. Methods This analysis included 28,242 participants without a history of stroke from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort. Participants were categorized into the 6-level ordinal National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. The prevalence of stroke risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and heart disease) was assessed across the rural-urban scale with adjustment for demographic characteristics and further adjustment for nSES score. Findings Hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease were more prevalent in rural than urban regions. Higher odds were observed for these risk factors in the most rural compared to the most urban areas (odds ratios [95% CI]: 1.25 [1.11-1.42] for hypertension, 1.15 [0.99-1.33] for diabetes, and 1.19 [1.02-1.39] for heart disease). Adjustment for nSES score partially attenuated the odds of hypertension and heart disease with rurality, completely attenuated the odds of diabetes, and unmasked an association of current smoking. Conclusions Some of the higher stroke mortality in rural areas may be due to the higher burden of stroke risk factors in rural areas. Lower nSES contributed most notably to rural-urban differences for diabetes and smoking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available