4.5 Article

Variations in Pediatric Rheumatology Workforce and Care Processes Across Canada

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 197-204

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.201611

Keywords

care delivery; care processes; models of care; pediatric rheumatologist; practice patterns; workforce

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Rheumatology Association - SickKids Clinician Scientist Training Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the Canadian pediatric rheumatology workforce and care processes. The findings reveal a national deficit of pediatric rheumatologists at the recommended benchmark, with a regional maldistribution of these specialists. Most rheumatologists work in multidisciplinary teams, but there may be inadequate support for allied health professionals (AHPs).
Objective. To examine the Canadian pediatric rheumatology workforce and care processes. Methods. Pediatric rheumatologists and allied health professionals (AHPs) participated. A designee from each academic center provided workforce information including the number of providers, total and breakdown of full-time equivalents (FTEs), and triage processes. We calculated the clinical FTE (cFTE) available per 75,000 (recommended benchmark) and 300,000 (adjusted) children using 2019 census data. The national workforce deficit was calculated as the difference between current and expected cFTEs. Remaining respondents were asked about ambulatory practices. Results. The response rate of survey A (workforce information) and survey B (ambulatory practice information) was 100% and 54%, respectively. The majority of rheumatologists (91%) practiced in academic centers. The median number of rheumatologists per center was 3 (IQR 3) and median cFTE was 1.9 (IQR 1.5). The median cFTE per 75,000 was 0.2 (IQR 0.3), with a national deficit of 80 cFTEs. With the adjusted benchmark, there was no national deficit, but there was a regional maldistribution of rheumatologists. All centers engaged in multidisciplinary practices with a median of 4 different AHPs, although the median FTE for AHPs was <= 1. Most centers (87%) utilized a centralized triage process. Of 9 (60%) centers that used an electronic triage process, 6 were able to calculate wait times. Most clinicians integrated quality improvement practices, such as previsit planning (67%), postvisit planning (68%), and periodic health outcome monitoring (36-59%). Conclusion. This study confirms a national deficit at the current recommended benchmark. Most rheumatologists work in multidisciplinary teams, but AHP support may be inadequate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available