4.6 Article

Maternal infection in gestation increases the risk of non-affective psychosis in offspring: a meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 125-131

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.039

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Psychosis; Maternal; Infection; Gestation; Pregnancy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research U.K.
  2. John Fell Fund from the University of Oxford

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maternal infection during gestation is associated with an increased risk of non-affective psychosis, especially schizophrenia. Risk is higher for infections during the second trimester compared to the first and third trimesters.
Maternal infection is thought to increase the risk of non-affective psychosis including schizophrenia. However, observational studies have produced conflicting results and little is known about the importance of timing of infection in mediating subsequent risk. In this study, we carried out a meta-analysis of observational studies to investigate the risk of maternal infection and subsequent risk of non-affective psychosis. Using seven cohort studies, we found that maternal infection during gestation increased the risk of non-affective psychosis [relative risk (RR): 1.28 (95% CI:1.05-1.57, p = 0.02, I2 = 36%)]. A subgroup analysis identified that there was greater risk for schizophrenia alone [RR: 1.65 (95% CI:1.23-2.22, p = 0.0008, I2 = 0%)]. In addition, infection during the second trimester resulted in increased risk [RR: 1.63 (95% CI:1.07-2.48, p = 0.02, I2 = 7%)], whilst risk during the first and third trimesters did not meet statistical significance. This study highlights maternal infection in gestation as an important environmental risk factor for non-affective psychosis and our findings carry important implications for future disease prevention strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available