4.5 Article

Brownian systems perturbed by mild shear: comparing response relations

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 33, Issue 40, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac0c3c

Keywords

Brownian motion; shear flow; linear response theory in statistical physics; fluctuation-dissipation theorem; Green-Kubo relations

Funding

  1. German Academic Scholarship Foundation (Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes)
  2. Physics Department of the University of Stuttgart
  3. DFG [SFB 1432]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we comprehensively investigate the linear response of interacting underdamped Brownian particles to simple shear flow through six different computational methods, revealing interesting effects due to interactions and finite particle mass. We compare the statistical efficiency of the different methods and discuss measures of breakdown of linear response theory for larger shear rates.
We present a comprehensive study of the linear response of interacting underdamped Brownian particles to simple shear flow. We collect six different routes for computing the response, two of which are based on the symmetry of the considered system and observable with respect to the shear axes. We include the extension of the Green-Kubo relation to underdamped cases, which shows two unexpected additional terms. These six computational methods are applied to investigate the relaxation of the response towards the steady state for different observables, where interesting effects due to interactions and a finite particle mass are observed. Moreover, we compare the different response relations in terms of their statistical efficiency, identifying their relative demand on experimental measurement time or computational resources in computer simulations. Finally, several measures of breakdown of linear response theory for larger shear rates are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available