4.5 Article

Exploring a low temperature glassy state, exchange bias effect, and high magnetic anisotropy in Co2C nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 33, Issue 37, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac0f9f

Keywords

nanoparticles; magnetism; exchange bias; spin glass; magnetic anisotropy

Funding

  1. IIT Kanpur
  2. Department of Science and Technology-India, AMT program
  3. Department of Science and Technology-India, Imprint II program
  4. Infosys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By exploring 40 nm diameter Co2C nanoparticles, a unique connection between EBE and MA at low temperatures is revealed, demonstrating distinctive properties. The exchange coupling of frozen ferromagnetic spins with a freely rotatable spin component results in the coexistence of ferromagnetism and a glassy behavior at low temperatures.
It is interesting to explore the connections between the exchange bias effect (EBE) and magnetic anisotropy (MA). It is often found that materials exhibiting a strong EBE also have enhanced MA. Here we explore 40 nm diameter Co2C nanoparticles (NPs) that exhibit ferromagnetism with a blocking temperature exceeding 300 K. We report the first observation of EBE in these Co2C NPs below 50 K. The effect arises from the exchange coupling of frozen ferromagnetic spins with a freely rotatable spin component. The dynamics of the freely rotatable component freezes in a temperature range between 5 K to 20 K resulting in low-temperature coexistence of a glassy behavior along with ferromagnetism. In fact, Co2C displays a unique separation of onset temperatures of spin freezing (similar to 20 K), vanishing of EBE (similar to 50 K), and magnetic blocking (> 450 K). Our calculations show that Co2C NPs have a core-shell structure. Our study suggests that modifying chemical co-ordination in the shell is one of the effective routes to manipulating MA compared to manipulating EBE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available