4.6 Review

Electrical wire explosion as a source of underwater shock waves

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 54, Issue 40, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac10a3

Keywords

underwater; shock waves; electrical wire explosion

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0710500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Underwater Electrical Wire Explosion (UEWE) is an efficient source of underwater shock waves, with good controllability and repeatability, already showing success in industrial applications and promising potential in various fields. The review evaluates physical processes, numerical simulation methods, electrical and shock wave characteristics, and current/potential applications, while also providing suggestions for future research directions.
The underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE) is an appealing source of underwater shock waves (SWs) with a high conversion efficiency from electrical energy to mechanical energy, good repeatability and controllability. Industrial applications are already seen in oil-well unblocking and stratum stimulation, and research is currently underway to apply UEWEs in electro-hydraulic forming, exploitation of unconventional gas and oil resources, etc. The emerging new applications call for a review on UEWE research from the perspective of an efficient SW source. This review paper considers the physical processes and numerical simulation methods, electrical and SW characteristics, and current and potential applications, and provides suggestions for future research directions. The code (XJ_UEWE01) developed by the authors to solve a coupling model of UEWE is included. The paper will provide students and researchers new to this field with an explanation of basic concepts of UEWE and a detailed overview of previous studies, and will aid research on UEWE applications, especially device development and parameter optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available