4.6 Article

Shor-Movassagh chain leads to unusual integrable model

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ac1f3f

Keywords

random walk model; integrable spin chain; boundary Yang-Baxter equation; crossing unitarity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11805152, 12047502, 11947301]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province Grant [2019JQ-107]
  3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Theoretical Physics Frontiers in China
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Co-design Center for Quantum Advantage (C2QA) [DE-SC0012704]
  5. SUNY center for QIS at Long Island project [CSP181035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we prove the integrability of the free Shor-Movassagh model, construct the Lax pair, and obtain boundary K-matrices compatible with the integrability on the open interval. Due to the non-invertibility of the partial transpose of the R matrix, the model lacks crossing unitarity and the integrable open chain cannot be constructed using the reflection equation.
The ground state of the Shor-Movassagh chain can be analytically described by the Motzkin paths. There is no analytical description of the excited states. The model is not solvable. We prove the integrability of the model without interacting part in this paper (free Shor-Movassagh). The Lax pair for the free Shor-Movassagh open chain is explicitly constructed. We further obtain the boundary K-matrices compatible with the integrability of the model on the open interval. Our construction provides a direct demonstration for the quantum integrability of the model, described by the Yang-Baxter algebra. Because the partial transpose of the R matrix is not invertible, the model does not have crossing unitarity and the integrable open chain cannot be constructed by the reflection equation (boundary Yang-Baxter equation).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available