4.6 Article

Laboratory Experiments on CO2 Gas Exchange with Wave Breaking

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 51, Issue 10, Pages 3105-3116

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-20-0272.1

Keywords

Wave breaking; Air-sea interaction; Carbon dioxide

Categories

Funding

  1. DISI Australia-China Centre [ACSRF48199]
  2. U.S. Office of Naval Research Grant [N00014-17-1-3021]
  3. U.S. ONR Global support [N6290920-1-2080]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41821004]
  5. international cooperation project of the China-Australia Research Centre for Maritime Engineering of Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2016YFE0101400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The laboratory experiments show a direct relationship between CO2 gas transfer velocity and wave height and wave orbital velocity, while wind speed alone cannot adequately describe the transfer velocity. Nondimensional equations are established to express gas transfer velocity as a function of wave parameters and an additional factor for wind influence.
The CO2 gas transfer velocity (KCO2) at air-sea interface is usually parameterized with the wind speed, but to a great extent it is defined by waves and wave breaking. To investigate the direct relationship between KCO2 and waves, laboratory experiments are conducted in a wind-wave flume. Three types of waves are forced in the flume: modulational wave trains generated by a wave maker, wind waves with 10-m wind speed ranging from 4.5 to 15.5ms(-1), and (mechanically generated) modulational wave trains coupled with superimposed wind force. The wave height and wave orbital velocity are found to be well correlated with KCO2 whereas wind speed alone cannot adequately describe KCO2. To reconcile the measurements, nondimensional equations are established in which gas transfer velocity is expressed as a main function of wave parameters and an additional secondary factor to account for influence of the wind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available