4.8 Article

Renormalized Singles Green's Function in the T-Matrix Approximation for Accurate Quasiparticle Energy Calculation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 26, Pages 6203-6210

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01723

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01-GM061870]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1900338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces the G(RS)T(0) and G(RS)T(RS) methods, which combine the RS Green's function and T-matrix approximation to compute quasiparticle energies in molecular systems, comparing their performance with G(0)T(0) and G(0)W(0) methods for valence and core states, as well as the dependence of G(0)T(0) method on density functional approximations.
We combine the renormalized singles (RS) Green's function with the T-matrix approximation for the single-particle Green's function to compute quasiparticle energies for valence and core states of molecular systems. The G(RS)T(0) method uses the RS Green's function that incorporates singles contributions as the initial Green's function. The G(RS)T(RS) method further calculates the generalized effective interaction with the RS Green's function by using RS eigenvalues in the T-matrix calculation through the particle-particle random phase approximation. The G(RS)T(RS) method provides significant improvements over one-shot methods G(0)T(0) and G(0)W(0) as demonstrated in calculations for GW100 and CORE65 test sets. It also systematically eliminates the dependence of G(0)T(0) on the choice of density functional approximations. For valence states, the G(RS)T(RS) method provides excellent accuracy, which is better than that of G(0)T(0) and G(0)W(0). For core states, the GRSTRS method identifies correct peaks in the spectral function and significantly outperforms G(0)T(0) on core-level binding energies (CLBEs) and relative CLBEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available