4.8 Article

Comparative Study of Red/Green/Blue Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes by Time-Resolved Transient Electroluminescence

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 29, Pages 7019-7025

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01560

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1737109, 11933006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study on quantum-dot light-emitting diodes (QLEDs) using time-resolved transient electroluminescence (TREL) revealed that insufficient electron injection at the type II heterojunction affected the performance of B-QLEDs. By applying a polymer as the hole-transporting layer, the efficiency of B-QLEDs improved with an increase in turn-on voltage and the appearance of a transient electroluminescence spike after voltage turn-off.
To understand the electronic processes in quantum-dot light-emitting diodes (QLEDs), a comparative study was performed by time-resolved transient electroluminescence (TREL). We fabricated red, green, and blue (R-, G-, and B-) QLEDs with poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-co-N-(4-sec-butylphenyl)diphenylamine) as the hole-transporting layer with conventional structures. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) and current efficiency were 19.2% and 22.7 cd A(-1) for R-QLEDs, 21.1% and 93.3 cd A(-1) for G-QLEDs, and 10.6% and 10.4 cd A(-1) for B-QLEDs, respectively. The TREL results for B-QLEDs were remarkably different from those for R- and G-QLEDs because of the insufficient electron injection crossing the type II heterojunction between the emission layer and the electron-transporting layer. We further applied poly(N-vinylcarbazole) as the hole-transporting layer and obtained much better performance for B-QLEDs, with EQE and current efficiency of 15.9% and 15.4 cd respectively. Concomitant with the increase in EQE are an increase in the turn-on voltage from 2.3 to 3.7 V and a transient electroluminescence spike after voltage turn-off.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available