4.6 Article

Influence of Stacking Order of Phthalocyanine and Fullerene Layers on the Photoexcited Carrier Dynamics in Model Organic Solar Cell

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 125, Issue 25, Pages 13963-13970

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03584

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEXT, Japan [16H03867, 16H06027]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06027, 16H03867] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, time-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to investigate the influence of stacking order of CuPc and C-60 in organic photovoltaics on photoexcited carrier dynamics. The results show that electron transfer is facilitated in CuPc/C-60/TiO2 stacking, while fast electron transfer is suppressed in C-60/CuPc/TiO2 stacking.
Metal phthalocyanine and fullerene are typical p-type and n-type organic semiconductors and are often used as constituents of model systems of organic photovoltaics (OPVs). The light-electricity conversion efficiency of the OPVs is influenced by many factors, and a composite structure is one of them. In the present study, time-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been utilized to examine the influence of the stacking order of copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) and fullerene (C-60) on photoexcited carrier dynamics in layered CuPc-C-60 thin-film OPVs fabricated on a rutile TiO2(110) substrate. TiO2 is a strong n-type semiconductor and is found to serve as an electron acceptor, which collects the excited electrons in both CuPc and C-60 layers irrespective of their stacking order. However, a clear difference is found in the electron transfer from C-60 to TiO2 in short delay times below 1 ns; an electron transfer is facilitated in CuPc/C-60/TiO2 stacking, whereas the fast electron transfer is suppressed in C-60/CuPc/TiO2 stacking. The insertion of the CuPc layer between C-60 and TiO2 is effective to block the C-60. TiO2 electron transfer even though the CuPc layer has a monolayer thickness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available