4.6 Article

Demystifying the Formation of Colloidal Perovskite Nanocrystals via Controlling Stepwise Synthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 125, Issue 26, Pages 14204-14211

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04140

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51961135107, 51774034]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0119700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation process of colloidal lead halide perovskite nanocrystals undergoes three stages, with the need for PbBr64- octahedrons to form first in order to react with Cs+ ions to create perovskite crystals.
As an emerging optoelectronic material, colloidal lead halide perovskite nanocrystals (PeNCs) have attracted considerable interest, but the fundamental and crucial formation mechanism of PeNCs is still unclear due to the fast speed of the chemical synthesis. Here, we developed a novel stepwise method to explore the formation process of CsPbBr3 PeNCs. Polar alcohol was used to trigger the formation reaction of PeNCs, thereby controlling the reaction speed and achieving stepwise synthesis. Our work found that the synthesis of PeNCs undergoes three formation steps: PbBr3- complexes, PbBr64- octahedrons, and perovskite crystals. The PbBr3- complexes were first formed through the coordination of Pb2+ and Br- ions in the precursor solution and then were transformed into PbBr64- octahedrons by being triggered with the polar alcohol. Finally, the PbBr64- octahedrons reacted with the free-state Cs+ ions to form perovskites. The PbBr64- octahedrons should be formed first, otherwise the Cs+ ions are always in the free state in the precursor solution so that they cannot react with lead bromide complexes to form perovskite crystals. This study provides new insights into the formation process of PeNCs and new thinking for designing and constructing PeNCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available