4.6 Article

Study on the Origin of Fluorescence by Using Dual-Emission Carbon Dots

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 125, Issue 33, Pages 18543-18551

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06137

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [1107047002]
  2. Key Research and Development Plan (Modern Agriculture) of Jiangsu Province [BE2018385]
  3. Innovation platform project - Jiangsu Province [6907041203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-emission N-doped carbon dots were synthesized through a solvothermal reaction and the second emission band of N-CDs can be tuned by changing the polarity of the solvent, showing obvious solvent dependence. The findings greatly improve our understanding of the fluorescence origin of CDs and help guide future preparations of novel nanomaterials.
Fluorescent carbon dots (CDs) have attracted growing attention and have exhibited widespread potential applications in photo-catalysis, bioimaging, and optoelectronics in recent years. However, due to the complex structure of CDs, both the molecular ingredients and the intrinsic mechanisms governing the fluorescence (FL) of CDs are poorly understood. Herein, dual-emission N-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) were synthesized through the solvothermal reaction of p-phenylenediamine and folic acid in deionized water. Interestingly enough, the second emission band of N-CDs can be tuned by changing the polarity of the solvent, showing an obvious solvent dependence. The first emission band has obvious excitation-wavelength dependence, while the second emission band does not. The first emission band likely comes from diversified amide units, while the homogeneous polymers chains are the most likely origin of the second emission band. These findings greatly improve our understanding of the FL origin of CDs and help to guide future preparations of novel nanomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available