4.6 Review

Advances in Clayff Molecular Simulation of Layered and Nanoporous Materials and Their Aqueous Interfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 125, Issue 32, Pages 17573-17589

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04600

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division [FWP 21015452]
  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  3. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA-0003525]
  4. industrial chair Storage and Disposal of Radioactive Waste at the Institut Mines-Telecom Atlantique - ANDRA
  5. Orano
  6. EDF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clayff, a general-purpose force field for molecular simulations of layered materials and fluid interfaces, is widely used in atomistic computational modeling for predicting properties of various materials due to its success, transferability, and simple functional form. Recent modifications have extended its applications to surface terminations, providing potential for future developments.
As a general-purpose force field for molecular simulations of layered materials and their fluid interfaces, Clayff continues to see broad usage in atomistic computational modeling for numerous geoscience and materials science applications due to its (1) success in predicting properties of bulk nanoporous materials and their interfaces, (2) transferability to a range of layered and nanoporous materials, and (3) simple functional form which facilitates incorporation into a variety of simulation codes. Here, we review applications of Clayff to model bulk phases and interfaces not included in the original parameter set and recent modifications for modeling surface terminations such as hydroxylated nanoparticle edges. We conclude with a discussion of expectations for future developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available