4.4 Article

CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018

Journal

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0064853

Keywords

fundamental constants; precision measurements; QED; revised SI; conventional and SI electrical units; proton radius; fine-structure constant; Rydberg constant; electron and muon g-factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The text presents the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors in physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment considering all available theoretical and experimental data, with major improvements and inconsistencies discussed.
We report the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council. The recommended values can also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all theoretical and experimental data available through 31 December 2018. A discussion of the major improvements as well as inconsistencies within the data is given. The former include a decrease in the uncertainty of the dimensionless fine-structure constant and a nearly two orders of magnitude improvement of particle masses expressed in units of kg due to the transition to the revised International System of Units (SI) with an exact value for the Planck constant. Further, because the elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant also have exact values in the revised SI, many other constants are either exact or have significantly reduced uncertainties. Inconsistencies remain for the gravitational constant and the muon magnetic-moment anomaly. The proton charge radius puzzle has been partially resolved by improved measurements of hydrogen energy levels. (c) 2021 by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce on behalf of the United States. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available