4.6 Article

Dark adaptation and ability of pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry to identify nutrient limitation in the bloom-forming cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa (Kutzing)

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112186

Keywords

Cyanobacteria; Pulse-amplitude modulated fluorometry; Nutrient limitation; Microcystis aeruginosa; Photosynthetic yield

Funding

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Center for Sponsor, Control and Mitigation of Harmful Algal Blooms (NOAA PCM HAB) Program ed Coastal Ocean Research's Prevention [NA11NOS4780021]
  2. US EPA Great Lakes Restoration Initiative [GL 00E00843]
  3. National Science Foundation [IOS1451528]
  4. NOAA PCM HAB program [PCM29]
  5. New York Sea Grant [R/CTP-47]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the application of Fv/Fm to cyanobacteria using controlled experiments on a single isolate. The results showed significant differences in Fv/Fm estimates among PAM fluorometers for light- versus dark-adapted cell suspensions, with no effect of dark adaptation on Fv/Fm across a single nutrient treatment. All Fv/Fm methods could distinguish between different nutrient limitations, but not all specific nutrient stresses were resolved.
Harmful algal blooms in inland waters are widely linked to excess phosphorus (P) loading, but increasing evidence shows that their growth and formation can also be influenced by nitrogen (N) and iron (Fe). Deficiency in N, P, and Fe differentially affects cellular photosystems and is manifested as changes in photosynthetic yield (Fv/ Fm). While Fv/Fm has been increasingly used as a rapid and convenient in situ gauge of nutrient deficiency, there are few rigorous comparisons of instrument sensitivity and ability to resolve specific nutrient stresses. This study evaluated the application of Fv/Fm to cyanobacteria using controlled experiments on a single isolate and tested three hypotheses: i) single Fv/Fm measurements taken with different PAM fluorometers can distinguish among limitation by different nutrients, ii) measurements of Fv/Fm made by the addition of DCMU are comparable to PAM fluorometers, and iii) dark adaptation is not necessary for reliable Fv/Fm measurements. We compared Fv/ Fm taken from the bloom-forming Microcystis aeruginosa (UTEX LB 3037) grown in nutrient-replete treatment (R) and N-, P-, and Fe-limited treatments (LN, LP, LFe, respectively), using three pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometers and the chemical photosynthesis inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), and evaluated the effects of dark adaptation prior to PAM measurement. There were significant differences in Fv/Fm estimates among PAM fluorometers for light- versus dark-adapted cell suspensions over the whole experiment (21 days), which were all significantly higher than the DCMU-based measurements. However, dark adaptation had no effect on Fv/Fm when comparing PAM-based values across a single nutrient treatment. All Fv/Fm methods could distinguish LN and LP from R and LFe treatments but none were able to resolve LFe from R, or LN from LP cultures. These results indicated that for most PAM applications, dark adaptation is not necessary, and furthermore that single measurements of Fv/Fm do not provide a robust measurement of nutrient limitation in Microcystis aeruginosa UTEX LB 3037, and potentially other, common freshwater cyanobacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available