4.4 Article

Prospective quality of life outcomes in pediatric fecal incontinence following bowel management

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 56, Issue 8, Pages 1459-1464

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.04.025

Keywords

Fecal incontinence; Bowel management; Quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that participating in a formal bowel management program (BMP) can significantly improve symptoms of fecal incontinence in patients, and have positive effects on psychosocial development and caregiver stress.
Background: Severe fecal incontinence (FI) is common in patients both with and without anorectal malformations. Whether a formal bowel management program (BMP) has significant effects on FI, psychosocial development of the child, and caregiver stress is poorly understood. We hypothesize that BMP participation results in long-term clinical and quality of life (QOL) improvements for patients and caregivers. Methods: Using a prospective cohort study over three years, 342 children (age 3-12 years) and caregivers were followed for one year after attending a week-long BMP, during which a regimen was tailored to promote daily stool evacuation.FI QOL was measured with the validated Cincinnati Fecal Incontinence Scale (CINCY-FIS), evaluating multiple subscales, including parental stress. Scores were obtained at multiple timepoints following BMP (baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 1 year). Results: Within 2 weeks, BMP participation significantly improved FI with increased frequency of daily daytime voluntary bowel movements (20%-70%, p < 0.001) and decreased daily daytime and nighttimeinvoluntary bowel movements (60%-20%, p < 0.001; 30%-10%, p < 0.05). Marked improvements in CINCY-FIS were observed across multiple QOL subscales, with the greatest in parental stress, and sustained through one year. Conclusions: BMP results in significant and sustained improvement in FI and QOL for patients and caregivers. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available