4.7 Article

Evolution of 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings in Patients After COVID-19: An Initial Investigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 270-273

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262296

Keywords

infectious disease; PET/CT; respiratory; F-18-FDG; COVID-19; PET/CT

Funding

  1. Breathing Matters
  2. U.K. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre's funding scheme
  3. UCL Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the temporal evolution of pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake in patients with COVID-19 and PCLD. The findings indicated that in acute COVID-19, pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake increased with time after infection, while in PCLD patients treated with steroids showed lower uptake.
The aim of this study was to assess the temporal evolution of pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and post-COVID-19 lung disease (PCLD). Methods: Using our hospital's clinical electronic records, we retrospectively identified 23 acute COVID-19, 18 PCLD, and 9 completely recovered F-18-FDG PET/CT patients during the 2 peaks of the U.K. pandemic. Pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake was measured as a lung target-to-back-ground ratio (TBRlung = SUVmax/SUVmin) and compared with temporal stage. Results: In acute COVID-19, less than 3 wk after infection, TBRlung was strongly correlated with time after infection (r(s) = 0.81, P < 0.001) and was significantly higher in the late stage than in the early stage (P = 0.001). In PCLD, TBRlung was lower in patients treated with high-dose steroids (P = 0.003) and in asymptomatic patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake in COVID-19 increases with time after infection. In PCLD, pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake rises despite viral clearance, suggesting ongoing inflammation. There was lower pulmonary F-18-FDG uptake in PCLD patients treated with steroids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available