4.5 Article

Reality of Accomplishing Surgery within 24 Hours for Complete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practices and Safety

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 38, Issue 21, Pages 3011-3019

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2021.0177

Keywords

cervical spinal cord; patient safety; spinal cord injuries; spinal cord trauma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Substantial clinical data support the association between early surgical decompression and superior neurological outcomes in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury patients. However, a significant proportion of patients do not undergo surgery within the recommended time frame, and patient and hospital characteristics have minimal impact on the variability in timing of surgery.
Substantial clinical data support an association between superior neurological outcomes and early (within 24 h) surgical decompression for those with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite this, much discussion persists around feasibility and safety of this time threshold, particularly for those with a complete cervical SCI. This study aims to assess clinical practices and the safety profile of early surgery across a large sample of North American trauma centers. Data were derived from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2010-2016. Adult patients with a complete cervical SCI (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] A) who underwent surgery were included. Patients were stratified into those receiving surgery at or before 24 h and those receiving delayed intervention. Risk-adjusted variability in surgical timing across trauma centers was investigated using mixed-effects regression. In-hospital adverse events including death, major complications, and immobility-related complications were compared between groups after propensity score matching. There were 2862 patients from 353 North American trauma centers included; 1760 (61.5%) underwent surgery within 24 h. Case-mix and hospital-level characteristics explained only 6% of the variability in surgical timing both between centers and within centers. No significant differences in adverse events were identified between groups. These findings suggest a relatively large proportion of patients are not receiving surgery within the recommended time frame, despite apparent safety. Moreover, patient and hospital-level characteristics explain little of the variability in time-to-surgery. Further knowledge translation is needed to increase the proportion of patients in whom surgery is performed before the 24-h threshold so patients might reach their greatest potential for neurological recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available