4.5 Review

Gender differences in early stages of language development. Some evidence and possible explanations

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages 643-653

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24914

Keywords

action-gesture; early language acquisition; gender differences; word comprehension; word production

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is controversy regarding gender differences in early language acquisition. Various studies suggest that there are some differences in behavior, gestures, and lexical development between girls and boys, but this is influenced by multiple factors.
It is a common feeling that girls speak earlier than boys; however, whether or not there are gender differences in early language acquisition remains controversial. The present paper aims to review the research on gender effects in early language acquisition and development, to determine whether, and from which age, an advantage for girls does eventually emerge. The focus is on the production of actions and communicative gestures, and early lexical comprehension and production, by girls and boys. The data from various studies that were conducted with direct and indirect tools suggest that some gender differences in actions, gesture, and lexical development depend on the interactions of different factors. Studies differ in terms of age ranges, sample sizes, and tools used, and the girl advantage is often slight and/or not evident at all ages considered. Statistical significance for gender differences appears to depend on the greater individual variability among boys, with respect to girls, which results in a greater number of boys classified as children with poor verbal ability. Biological (e.g., different maturational rates), neuropsychological (e.g., different cognitive strategies in solving tasks), and cultural (e.g., differences in the way parents relate socially to boys and girls) factors appear to interact, to create feedback loops of mutual reinforcement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available