4.4 Article

General anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: benefits beyond better reperfusion?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 767-771

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017999

Keywords

stroke; angiography; intervention; thrombectomy

Funding

  1. Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the outcomes of endovascular therapy under general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS) for stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. The results showed that the better outcome in the GA arm was mainly a direct effect rather than mediated by better reperfusion. Future research is needed to explore whether the stable condition and blood pressure under GA have a neuroprotective effect.
Background Endovascular therapy (EVT) is standard of care for stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Whether EVT should be performed under general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS) is controversial. While a meta-analysis of randomized trials showed better outcome for EVT under GA, observational studies suggested the opposite. A proposed advantage of GA is better reperfusion achieved via more successful handling of the immobile patient. The aim of this study was to investigate if the good outcome seen in patients treated under GA was mediated by better reperfusion. Methods The meta-analysis included 368 individual patients from three randomized controlled trials, of whom 185 patients were randomized to CS. A mediator analysis was performed to examine if the better outcome in the GA arm was driven by higher reperfusion rate. Results The total effect showed a risk difference (RD) of 0.15 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.25), associating GA with a beneficial outcome. The direct effect of GA constituted a large portion, with an RD of 0.12 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.22), while only a small portion was mediated through the degree of reperfusion, with an RD of 0.03 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.04). Conclusion The better outcome after EVT in the GA arm was mainly a direct effect-that is, an effect that was not explained by better reperfusion. We also found a better outcome in the GA arm when reperfusion was not achieved. Whether this is an effect of the stable condition and blood pressure under GA or a neuroprotective effect will need to be investigated in future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available