4.5 Article

NIH funding trends for neurosurgeon-scientists from 1993-2017: Biomedical workforce implications for neurooncology

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages 51-62

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03797-5

Keywords

Neurosurgeon-Scientist; Clinician-scientist; National Institutional of Health (NIH) funding to neuro-surgery; Funding; Training; Research

Funding

  1. Mayo Clinic Professorship and a Clinician Investigator award
  2. Florida State Department of Health Research Grant
  3. Mayo Clinic Graduate School
  4. NIH [R43CA221490, R01CA200399, R01CA195503, R01CA216855]
  5. Earl & Nyda Swanson Neurosciences Research Fund
  6. Harley N. and Rebecca N. Hotchkiss Endowed Fund in Neuroscience Research, Honoring Ken and Marietta
  7. NIH/NINDS [U01-NS108916]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past 23 years, despite an overall increase in NIH grants awarded to neurosurgery departments, the proportion of neurosurgeon-scientists receiving NIH funding compared to scientists has been decreasing. The shift is seen in more funding allocated to senior neurosurgeon-scientists compared to early-career ones, with a focus on neurosurgical oncology-related grants.
Introduction Neurosurgeons represent 0.5% of all physicians and currently face a high burden of disease. Physician-scientists are essential to advance the mission of National Academies of Science (NAS) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) through discovery and bench to bedside translation. We investigated trends in NIH neurosurgeon-scientist funding over time as an indicator of physician-scientist workforce training. Methods We used NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORTER) to extract grants to neurosurgery departments and neurosurgeons from 1993 to 2017. Manual extraction of each individual grant awardee was conducted. Results After adjusting for U.S. inflation (base year: 1993), NIH funding to neurosurgery departments increased yearly (P < 0.00001). However, neurosurgeon-scientists received significantly less NIH funding compared to scientists (including basic scientists and research only neurosurgeons) (P = 0.09). The ratio of neurosurgeon-scientists to scientists receiving grants was significantly reduced (P = 0.002). Interestingly, the percentage of oncology-related neurosurgery grants significantly increased throughout the study period (P = 0.002). The average number of grants per neurosurgeon-scientists showed an upward trend (P < 0.001); however, the average number of grants for early-career neurosurgeon-scientists, showed a significant downward trend (P = 0.05). Conclusion Over the past 23 years, despite the overall increasing trends in the number of NIH grants awarded to neurosurgery departments overall, the proportion of neurosurgeon-scientists that were awarded NIH grants compared to scientists demonstrates a declining trend. This observed shift is disproportionate in the number of NIH grants awarded to senior level compared to early-career neurosurgeon-scientists, with more funding allocated towards neurosurgical-oncology-related grants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available