4.5 Article

Why and how should we promote home dialysis for patients with end-stage kidney disease during and after the coronavirus 2019 disease pandemic? A French perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 985-989

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01061-7

Keywords

Home Dialysis; Peritoneal Dialysis; Home Haemodialysis; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The health crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted dialysis patients in France, with a higher incidence and mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among them compared to the general population. Home dialysis has been shown to reduce the risk of infection, but its development in France faces obstacles such as pricing policies, lack of training, and limited information. Proposed initiatives aim to provide objective information, expand home dialysis networks, and increase prices for home dialysis procedures to improve the situation.
The health crisis induced by the pandemic of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) has had a major impact on dialysis patients in France. The incidence of infection with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic was 3.3% among dialysis patients-13 times higher than in the general population. The corresponding mortality rate was high, reaching 21%. As of 19th April, 2021, the cumulative prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in French dialysis patients was 14%. Convergent scientific data from France, Italy, the United Kingdom and Canada show that home dialysis reduces the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by a factor of at least two. Unfortunately, home dialysis in France is not sufficiently developed: the proportion of dialysis patients being treated at home is only 7%. The obstacles to the provision of home care for patients with end-stage kidney disease in France include (i) an unfavourable pricing policy for home haemodialysis and nurse visits for assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), (ii) insufficient training in home dialysis for nephrologists, (iii) the small number of administrative authorizations for home dialysis programs, and (iv) a lack of structured, objective information on renal replacement therapies for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We propose a number of pragmatic initiatives that could be simultaneously enacted to improve the situation in three areas: (i) the provision of objective information on renal replacement therapies for patients with advanced CKD, (ii) wider authorization of home dialysis networks and (iii) price increases in favour of home dialysis procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available