4.7 Article

Rational Multitargeted Drug Design Strategy from the Perspective of a Medicinal Chemist

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 15, Pages 10581-10605

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00683

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872906]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2020GN033]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  4. Fund of Taishan scholar project
  5. Qingdao Science and Technology Benefit People Demonstration Guide Special Project [20-3-4-20 nsh]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of multitarget-directed ligands (MTDLs) is a widely focused research topic, but rational design remains a challenge. Strategies for designing MTDLs include merging lead compounds with similar functional groups, fusing key pharmacophores directly, and using the linked-pharmacophore strategy. The pharmacophores of second targets should not affect the binding mode of the original ones, and the inhibitory activities of the two targets need to be adjusted.
The development of multitarget-directed ligands (MTDLs) has become a widely focused research topic, but rational design remains as an enormous challenge. This paper reviews and discusses the design strategy of incorporating the second activity into an existing single-active ligand. If the binding sites of both targets share similar endogenous substrates, MTDLs can be designed by merging two lead compounds with similar functional groups. If the binding sites are large or adjacent to the solution, two key pharmacophores can be fused directly. If the binding regions are small and deep inside the proteins, the linked-pharmacophore strategy might be the only way. The added pharmacophores of second targets should not affect the binding mode of the original ones. Moreover, the inhibitory activities of the two targets need to be adjusted to achieve an optimal ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available