4.3 Article

Vaccine passports and health disparities: a perilous journey

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 957-960

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107491

Keywords

COVID-19; public health ethics; ethics; conscientious objection; minority groups

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses health equity concerns regarding the use of vaccine passports to certify COVID-19 vaccination for domestic and international travel, and proposes solutions for both scenarios.
This paper raises health equity concerns about the use of passports for domestic and international travel to certify COVID-19 vaccination. Part I argues that for international travel, health equity objections undercut arguments defending vaccine passports, which are based on tholding people responsible, protecting global health, safeguarding individual liberty and continuing current practice. Part II entertains a proposal for a scaled down vaccine passport for domestic use in countries where vaccines are widely and equitably available. It raises health equity concerns related to racial profiling and fairness to people who are vaccine cautious. Part III sets forth a proposal for a flexible pass that certifies people who have been vaccinated, tested, previously infected or granted a conscientious objection. It sets ethical guidelines for the timing and use of flexible passes that promote equity, public health education, antidiscrimination, privacy and flexibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available