4.2 Article

Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 25, Pages 7417-7421

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1949448

Keywords

Decreased fetal movements; prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert; cervical ripening balloon; induction of labor; pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study indicates that both pharmacological and mechanical methods can be safely and efficiently used for cervical ripening in women with decreased fetal movements at term. Nulliparous women may experience longer labor with repeat prostaglandin E2 use compared to the cervical ripening balloon group, but maternal or fetal safety is not compromised.
Objective To determine the optimal method for cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements at term. We hypothesized that women who undergo induction of labor for decreased fetal movements represent a higher risk group, and will benefit from mechanical intervention with cervical ripening balloon rather than with pharmacological prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert. Study design Retrospective cohort study from January 2014 and January 2019. We recommended induction of labor to every woman >= 39 weeks' gestation with complaints of persistent decreased fetal movements. We excluded women with major fetal anomalies, Bishop score of >= 6 on admission, and cases with contraindications to prostaglandins. Women were allocated into one of two groups based on the cervical ripening agent used. In group 1 we introduced the prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert (10 mg dinoprostone in a timed-release formulation). In group 2 we placed the mechanical cervical ripening balloon. The primary outcome of the study, analyzed separately to nulliparous and multiparous women, was the rate of cesarean delivery in each of the groups. Results During the 5-years study, 294 women were included in the final analysis, of which 201 were in the prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert group and 93 were in the cervical ripening balloon group. The rate of cesarean delivery was comparable between the groups (nulliparous: 20.8%, 16/77 versus 21.3%, 10/47. multiparous: 16.9%, 21/124 versus 7%, 3/46, respectively). Other maternal and neonatal secondary outcomes, including the induction-to-delivery time (nulliparous: 32.5 +/- 25.3 h versus 26.5 +/- 12.2 h. multiparous: 24.6 +/- 17.2 h versus 21.25 +/- 12.3 h, respectively), were also not different between the two induction methods used. A longer induction-to-delivery time was observed in nulliparous women who had repeat prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert compared with the cervical ripening balloon group (74.6 +/- 27.3 h versus 26.5 +/- 12.2 h, p < .01). Conclusion Both pharmacological and mechanical methods can safely and efficiently be used for cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements at term. With repeat prostaglandin E2 use, nulliparous women may experience a prolong labor compared with the cervical ripening balloon group, but maternal or fetal safety are not compromised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available