4.2 Article

Fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion and pulmonary hypertension in moderate congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 25, Pages 6967-6972

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1932806

Keywords

Pulmonary hypertension; congenital diaphragmatic hernia; fetal tracheal occlusion; fetal survival; moderate severity CDH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that FETO is associated with resolution of PH by hospital discharge in fetuses with moderate left-sided CDH according to O/E-LHR criteria, with no significant differences in other outcomes.
Objective To study the role of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) on resolution of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in fetuses with isolated moderate left-sided diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Methods This retrospective study included fetuses with CDH evaluated between February 2004 and July 2017. Using the tracheal occlusion to accelerate lung growth (TOTAL) trial definition, we classified fetuses into moderate left CDH if O/E-LHR (observed/expected-lung head ratio) was 25-34.9% regardless of liver position or O/E-LHR of 35-44.9% if liver was in the chest. Postnatal echocardiograms were used to diagnose PH. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship of FETO with study outcomes. Results Of 184 cases with no other major anomalies, 30 (16%) met criteria. There were nine FETO and 21 non-FETO cases. By hospital discharge, a higher proportion of infants in the FETO group had resolution of PH (87.5 (7/8) vs. 40% (8/20); p=.013). FETO was associated with adjusted odds ratio of 17.3 (95% CI: 1.75-171; p=.015) to resolve PH by hospital discharge. No significant differences were noted in need for ECMO or survival to discharge between groups. Conclusions Infants with moderate left-sided CDH according to O/E-LHR, FETO is associated with resolution of PH by the time of hospital discharge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available